Hearings and listings
51 - 100 of 117 search results for _
|Case Number||Name||Hearing Date|
|AT/0032/20||Empire Global Developments No.3 Pty Ltd v Commissioner for ACT Revenue||5 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|AT/0013/20||Empire Global Developments No.3 Pty Ltd v Commissioner for ACT Revenue||5 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|XD/1243/19||Azad v Stratus Plumbing Pty Ltd||5 Jun 2020 10:30 AM|
|XD/1478/19||Elmslea Projects Pty Ltd ACN 154 161 850 v Emmadale Projects Pty Ltd ACN145 581 675||5 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
|RT/0090/20||Cherian & Cherian v Saputra & Winarya||5 Jun 2020 9:00 AM|
|RT/0615/19||Leisel Douglas-Major v Commissioner for Social Housing||5 Jun 2020 2:30 PM|
|RT/0316/20||Jonathon Keegan & Jack Hitchen v Brendan Hawke||5 Jun 2020 12:00 PM|
|RT/0357/20||Burke & Sweeney v Nicolas Investments||5 Jun 2020 11:15 AM|
|RT/0323/20||Feng & Mao v Sheldrick||5 Jun 2020 10:30 AM|
|RT/0318/20||Li & Ors v Gu||5 Jun 2020 9:00 AM|
|RT/0280/20||Chowdhury & Uzzaman v Ivers & Ivers||9 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|XD/1577/19||Kim Winks v Australasian College Of Road Safety Incorporated||9 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|XD/0260/20||Kelly Carroll v Fisher & Paykel Australia Pty Ltd ACN 000 042 080||9 Jun 2020 3:30 PM|
|XD/0223/20||Dylan Smith & Norietta Scanlan v Asha Pandya & Prakash Pandya||9 Jun 2020 2:30 PM|
|XD/0003/20||Prakash Pandya & Asha Pandya v Norietta Scanlan & Dylan Smith||9 Jun 2020 2:30 PM|
|RT/0277/20||Li v Shen||9 Jun 2020 1:30 PM|
|XD/0233/20||Patrick Murray v Shaun Tahi Mortinsen||9 Jun 2020 11:30 AM|
|XD/0125/20||Tom Gourlay v David James Micallef & Future Electrical Technologies Pty Ltd ACN 156 173 107||9 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
|RT/0391/20||Anthony William Aiken v Havelock Housing Association Inc.||9 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
|AA/0005/20||ACN 120 452 744 Pty Ltd ACN 120 452 744 v Newham Business Brokers Pty Ltd & Anor||9 Jun 2020 12:00 PM|
|DT/0019/20||Suppressed||9 Jun 2020 11:00 AM|
|AT/0086/19||Morris Construction Corporation Pty Ltd v Construction Occupations Registrar||9 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
|AT/0085/19||Morris Construction Corporation Pty Ltd v Construction Occupations Registrar||9 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
|XD/0822/18||Canberra Rudolf Steiner Association Incorporated v Mila Haske||10 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|RT/0134/20||Olsen v Commissioner for Social Housing||10 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|XD/0147/20||The Owners - Units Plan No 1676 v Inbestimenta Pty Ltd ACN 139 635 635||10 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|XD/0172/20||Silvia Nestoroska v Acton Developments(ACT) Pty Ltd ACN 102 768 050 & Acton Investments (ACT) Pty Ltd ACN 106 428 782||10 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|UT/0011/20||The Owners Units Plan No 369 v Fshwick & Anor||10 Jun 2020 12:00 PM|
|UT/0010/20||Belmonte v Owners of Units Plan 213||10 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|XD/1589/19||Olga Bragina & Viacheslav Bragin v Art Projects Six Pty Ltd ACN 608 346 050 & Elisa Roso||10 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|XD/1739/19||Imran Rajput v Blessing Akoma & Uc Evans also known as Everestus Ugwumba||10 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|XD/0137/20||Brindabella Christian Education Limited ACN 100 229 669 v Justine Baekalia & Paul Baekalia Also Known As Chris Baekalia||10 Jun 2020 1:30 PM|
|XD/0135/20||Brindabella Christian Education Limited ACN 100 229 669 v Samuel McNamara & Hannah McNamara||10 Jun 2020 11:30 AM|
|XD/0134/20||Brindabella Christian Education Limited ACN 100 229 669 v Dana Hanna & Nathan Grant Hanna||10 Jun 2020 10:30 AM|
|XD/0139/20||Brindabella Christian Education Limited ACN 100 229 669 v Leigh-Anne Palmer & Terence Palmer||10 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
|RT/0233/20||Xinzhu Qin, Dawei Guo, Yilin Fang & Yang Yang v Hongguang He||11 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|XD/1123/19||Christine Mary Nichols v Amers Pty Ltd ACN 112 055 366||11 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|XD/1238/19||GH Constructions (A.C.T.) Pty Ltd ACN 100 960 254 v John Nott & Diane Nott||11 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|XD/0126/20||Cleanzone Pty Ltd ACN 088 376 167 v ELB PTY LTD ACN 118 842 372 & RADACA Investments Pty Ltd ACN 003 507 864||11 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|XD/0158/20||Ian Robinson & Christopher Quail v Janrule Pty Ltd ACN 003 484 571||11 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|RT/0406/20||Castro v Buckman & Anor||11 Jun 2020 4:00 PM|
|RT/0387/20||Hannink v Ihaz & Anor||11 Jun 2020 3:00 PM|
|RT/0392/20||Knox v Buckley||11 Jun 2020 2:00 PM|
|RT/0687/19||The Salvation Army Community Housing Service v Rose||11 Jun 2020 12:00 PM|
|RT/0719/19||South Canberra Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 606 747 602 v Jorgensen||11 Jun 2020 11:00 AM|
|RT/0701/19||Commissioner for Social Housing v Tanya Elizabeth Scardoni Also Known As Tanya Brown||11 Jun 2020 10:00 AM|
|RT/0281/20||McLachlan & Anor v Merlino||11 Jun 2020 3:30 PM|
|RT/0253/20||Evenden v Baker, Bardsley & Lipari||11 Jun 2020 1:30 PM|
|RT/0279/20||Bedi v Russell & Ors||11 Jun 2020 11:30 AM|
|RT/0278/20||He v Sun||11 Jun 2020 9:30 AM|
ACT Civil and Administrative TribunalA tribunal established under the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008. It may also be referred to as ACAT or Tribunal.
Administrative reviewACAT has jurisdiction to review some administrative decisions made by the ACT Government. Find out about Review of ACT Government decisions.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)Also known as dispute resolution. This is a way of resolving disputes without a formal hearing. It may involve a preliminary conference or mediation. ADR is used to help parties resolve cases by agreement.
AnorMeans ‘and another’. This term is generally used to name parties to proceedings when there is more than one applicant or respondent.
Appeal TribunalA tribunal constituted under section 81 of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal 2008 to review a decision of the tribunal (not all ACAT decisions are appealable at ACAT – you may need to go to the Supreme Court).
AppellantThe individual or company that appeals an ACAT decision.
ApplicantThe individual or company that brings a case to ACAT, usually by making an application.
Authorising lawsA law that says an application (including referrals) may be made to ACAT. An authorising law may also set out the powers ACAT has in a case. Also see ‘jurisdiction’.
Calling a witnessA party or their representative will ‘call a witness’ at an ACAT hearing when they ask a witness to give evidence.
CaseAlso known as a matter, dispute, application or referral. Cases come to ACAT when ACAT has jurisdiction (power) to make a decision.
Cross-examinationThe process of asking a witness questions to test or check the evidence that the witness has given to ACAT.
Defined benefitsare the following benefits (see section 33 of the MAI Act):
- income replacement benefits;
- treatment and care benefits;
- quality of life benefits;
- death benefits;
- funeral benefits.
Deliver a decisionAlso ‘handing down a decision’. This is giving a decision about an ACAT case. It may be done verbally or in writing (or both).
DirectionsInstructions that set out what each party must do (and when), often to prepare a case for hearing.
Directions hearingA short hearing where an ACAT Member or Registrar decides how to manage a case and what needs to be done before a hearing. Find out about directions hearings.
Ex parte orderAn order made by ACAT where one or more parties were not present.
Expert reportA written report from an expert that may be used as evidence.
Expert witnessA person with specialised knowledge based on their training, study or experience. An expert can give evidence at a hearing. Find out more about witness statements.
Final directions hearingSometimes ACAT will hold a final directions hearing prior to the final hearing of an application. The purpose is to make sure the case is ready to go to a hearing and give the parties a chance to ask questions about the hearing process.
Handed upGiving documents to an ACAT Member or Registrar in a hearing.
In chambersWhen ACAT considers something without holding a hearing.
Joined party (joined/joinder)A party who was not originally a party to the dispute but has later been added to the case.
JurisdictionACAT’s authority (power) to deal with, hear and decide applications (cases).
LeaveIf someone asks for leave, they are usually asking for permission to do something.
List (or listing)A schedule (or list) of cases to be heard at ACAT each day.
Listing noticeA letter or written document from ACAT that sets out when a conference, mediation or hearing is scheduled at ACAT.
MAI ActMotor Accident Injuries Act 2019 (ACT).
MediationA private meeting where parties discuss ways to resolve their dispute, with the help of an impartial mediator (who is also an ACAT Member or Registrar). It is held under section 35 of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008.
Non-publication and/or non-disclosure orderAlso called a ‘suppression order’. It is an order that requires certain information not to be published or disclosed. It is made under section 39 of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008. Find out about public hearings and confidentiality.
Opening statementUsually means a statement made at the beginning of a hearing to outline the key points in the case. Sometimes parties are asked to give an opening statement at a mediation or preliminary conference.
Originating applicationAn application that starts an ACAT case.
Party or partiesAn individual or company directly involved in an ACAT case, for example an applicant or respondent. Find out how to identify and name parties.
Preliminary conferenceA private meeting where parties discuss ways to resolve their dispute with the help of an ACAT Member or Registrar. See section 33 of the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008. ACAT has different types of preliminary conferences.
RegistryThe administrative section of ACAT that accepts documents lodged by parties, handles enquiries and provides support for case management.
Relevant insurerfor a motor accident, means the insurer under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2019 (see section 34) of the motor vehicle considered to be at fault for the motor accident in the ACT.
RepresentativeA person who represents or advocates for an individual or company at a conference, mediation or hearing at ACAT. For example, a legal practitioner or an attorney appointed under a general power of attorney.
Reserved decisionWhen an ACAT Member or Registrar reserves a decision (at the end of a hearing), this means they will give their decision later, either verbally or in writing (sometimes both).
RespondentThe party (or parties) against whom orders or relief is sought.
Serve/serviceA person who can give evidence at a hearing. Find out about witness statements.
Short service orderAn order that authorises a shorter time for service (than the time otherwise required).
Significant occupational impact (SOI)Significant impact on an injured person’s ability to undertake employment.
Statement of reasonsA document that explains why ACAT made an order in a case. It sets out the law relied on by an ACAT Member or Registrar and explains how the law was applied to the facts of the case. You can request a written statement of reasons within 14 days after an order is made. Find out about statement of reasons.
StayAn order for a particular action (or decision) to be put on hold or suspended for a period of time.
SubmissionA document that sets out your side of a case or dispute and the relevant law. It is presented to ACAT either in writing, verbally or both. Find out about submissions.
SubpoenaRequires a person to appear at ACAT to give evidence or provide documents (or both). Find out about subpoenas.
Substituted service orderAn order that says how a party is to be served with an application or other documents related to the proceedings. In a civil dispute or a rental dispute, an applicant will need to consider asking for a substituted service order if they do not have a physical address for the respondent. Find out about lodging and serving documents.
WitnessA person who can give evidence at a hearing. Find out about witness statements.